Match statistics snapshot
- Juventus created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.14, Δ 0.19).
- Como fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 342Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 409Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.80 | Goals prevented | 0.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |