Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 0.88, Δ 0.58).
- Juventus fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.03 | Goals prevented | 0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Juventus |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.