Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 0.25, Δ 1.07).
- Como fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Lazio |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Lazio |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 484Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 537Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Lazio |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Lazio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.12 | Goals prevented | -0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Lazio |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |