Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 0.44, Δ 1.57).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.11 | Goals prevented | 1.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |