Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (3.29 vs 0.24, Δ 3.05).
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 3.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 527Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 607Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.62 | Goals prevented | 0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |