Match statistics snapshot
- Monza created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 1.38, Δ 0.09).
- Como fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Monza was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 449Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.36 | Goals prevented | 0.36 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Monza |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |