Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 0.66, Δ 1.13).
- Como fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 327 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.70 | Goals prevented | 0.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.