Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 0.51, Δ 0.77).
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Parma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 7 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 510Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 585Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.02 | Goals prevented | 0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |