Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (2.77 vs 0.43, Δ 2.34).
- Como fired more attempts (23 vs 2 shots).
- Parma was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 30%).
Como vs Parma
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
| 23Lead | Total shots | 2 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 227 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.14 | Goals prevented | 1.14 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |