Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (3.24 vs 1.23, Δ 2.01).
- Como fired more attempts (28 vs 12 shots).
- Parma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Como vs Parma
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 3.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 24Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
| 28Lead | Total shots | 12 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 584Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 652Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.29 | Goals prevented | 1.29 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |