Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 22%).
- Pisa held more of the ball (54% possession).
Como vs Pisa
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 482Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |