Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.81 vs 0.78, Δ 1.03).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (72% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 564Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 628Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 11Lead |
| 0.17 | Goals prevented | 0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |