Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Sudtirol was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Sudtirol |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Sudtirol |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 353Lead |
| 401 | Total passes | 435Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Sudtirol |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Sudtirol |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Sudtirol |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |