Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Ternana was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 366Lead | Accurate passes | 327 |
| 432Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |