Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 1.22, Δ 0.15).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.33 | Goals prevented | 1.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |