Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (2.88 vs 0.48, Δ 2.40).
- Como fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 2.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 472Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.67 | Goals prevented | -1.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.