Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 0.59, Δ 0.85).
- Como fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 335Lead | Accurate passes | 324 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -1.85 | Goals prevented | -1.85 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |