Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 0.61, Δ 1.63).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 263 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 346 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.30 | Goals prevented | 0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Udinese |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |