Match statistics snapshot
- Venezia created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.33, Δ 0.32).
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.17 | Goals prevented | 1.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Venezia |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |