Match statistics snapshot
- Verona created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.52, Δ 0.02).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Verona was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 517Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 587Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.38 | Goals prevented | -1.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Verona |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |