Match statistics snapshot
- Ajaccio fired more attempts (16 vs 4 shots).
- Concarneau was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 383 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 465 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Ajaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.