Match statistics snapshot
- Concarneau fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Concarneau was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Bastia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Bastia |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 436Lead | Total passes | 396 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Bastia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Bastia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Bastia |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |