Match statistics snapshot
- Concarneau fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Grenoble was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 32%).
- Concarneau held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 461Lead | Accurate passes | 416 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 502 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |