Match statistics snapshot
- Concarneau fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Nantes was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 36%).
- Nantes held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |