Match statistics snapshot
- Concarneau fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Concarneau was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 20%).
- Concarneau held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Pau |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Pau |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 623Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 689Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Pau |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Pau |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Pau |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |