Match statistics snapshot
- Concarneau fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Concarneau was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
- Concarneau held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 467Lead | Accurate passes | 347 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concarneau | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |