Match statistics snapshot
- Concepción fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Concepción | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead |
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Concepción | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Concepción | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Concepción | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Concepción | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.