Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 438 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.