Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 224 | Accurate passes | 346Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.