Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 0.42, Δ 0.70).
- U.
- Catolica fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 1 |
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 260 | Accurate passes | 323Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.