Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 0.82, Δ 0.78).
- Coquimbo Unido fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 227Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 333Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.15 | Goals prevented | -0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | Universitario |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.