Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.55, Δ 0.93).
- Coritiba fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | America Mineiro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | America Mineiro |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 259 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 349 | Total passes | 543Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | America Mineiro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | America Mineiro |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | America Mineiro |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.