Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.50, Δ 0.72).
- Coritiba fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 291Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 360Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 18Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |