Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 1.10, Δ 0.89).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 155 | Accurate passes | 539Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.