Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 1.37, Δ 0.69).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.37Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 266 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.02 | Goals prevented | -0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.