Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 31%).
- Coritiba held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.