Match statistics snapshot
- Coritiba created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 0.70, Δ 0.13).
- Coritiba fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Coritiba was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 221 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coritiba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.