Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 13%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cork City | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cork City | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cork City | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cork City | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cork City | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |