Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.35, Δ 0.34).
- Çorum FK fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Çorum FK was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Çorum Fk | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Çorum Fk | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 217 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 290 | Total passes | 417Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Çorum Fk | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Çorum Fk | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Çorum Fk | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |