Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
- Como held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 271Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 381Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.