Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Cosenza was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |