Match statistics snapshot
- Feralpisalo fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Cosenza was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 26%).
- Cosenza held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cosenza | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.