Match statistics snapshot
- Coventry created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 0.50, Δ 1.35).
- Coventry fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coventry | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coventry | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 365 |
| 534Lead | Total passes | 447 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coventry | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coventry | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coventry | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |