Match statistics snapshot
- Coventry created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 0.96, Δ 1.08).
- Coventry fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Coventry was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coventry | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coventry | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 442 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coventry | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coventry | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coventry | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |