Match statistics snapshot
- Chesterfield created the clearer chances on xG (1.67 vs 1.84, Δ 0.17).
- Crawley Town fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Chesterfield was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13 | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 219Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 319 | Total passes | 328Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.