Match statistics snapshot
- Crawley Town created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 0.78, Δ 0.15).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Crawley Town was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 232Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 334Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.