Match statistics snapshot
- Grimsby created the clearer chances on xG (0.23 vs 1.21, Δ 0.98).
- Grimsby fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Grimsby was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 236Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 328Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crawley Town | Statistic | Grimsby |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |