Match statistics snapshot
- Atalanta created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.15, Δ 0.03).
- Atalanta fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 523Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.01 | Goals prevented | 0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |