Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 2.47, Δ 1.41).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.47Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 143 | Accurate passes | 455Lead |
| 208 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.17 | Goals prevented | -0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 3 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.