Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 0.92, Δ 1.16).
- Cremonese fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 264Lead |
| 339 | Total passes | 350Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.49 | Goals prevented | -0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |